Nice one! And..is it possible to have them both equal running at the same time? I mean: I leave both FC with same wwn, but just one of them run the share. What would happen in this case? May vmware understand that just one has the share? Will it get the new one once I move the share? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon Da: Guenther Alka A: discuss@lists.illumos.org Data: 7 settembre 2016 11.22.59 CEST Oggetto: Re: [discuss] smtf-ha and FC clustering possible? I do not use FC as my cluster solution is based on iSCSI and appliance failover but I would asume that you can set a WWN in fcadm create to keep it identical on a failover. fcadm -? Usage: fcadm -?,-V Usage: fcadm create-npiv-port [OPTIONS] OPTIONS: -p, --port -n, --node Usage: fcadm delete-npiv-port OPTIONS: -p, --port Usage: fcadm hba-port [OPTIONS] [WWN ...] OPTIONS: -l, --linkstat Usage: fcadm remote-port [WWN ...] OPTIONS: -p, --port -s, --scsi-target -l, --linkstat Usage: fcadm create-port-list Usage: fcadm create-fcoe-port [OPTIONS] OPTIONS: -i, --initiator -t, --target -p, --port -n, --node -f, --fcoe-force-promisc Usage: fcadm delete-fcoe-port Usage: fcadm list-fcoe-ports [OPTIONS] OPTIONS: -i, --initiator -t, --target Usage: fcadm force-lip Am 07.09.2016 um 09:59 schrieb Gabriele Bulfon: Hi, I was wandering if anyone here has ever played with FC clustering with smtf-ha (from Saso Kilsekov git) or other ways on a dual system. We have at our disposal a dual supermicro machine with shared storage and with one FC 8Gb each, another FC 8Gb on a vmware host, and a very expensive FC switch. I have installed and tested our corosync/pacemaker packages on both nodes running XStreamOS, and configured everything to cluster up to the ip / pools / zones movement between the nodes. All of this works as expected, and also iSCSI can migrate and be available again in few moments. We have then connected all the FC infrastructure and tested normal wwn sharing of volumes to vmware. Now I would really like to see if your stmf-ha can really be modified to do the job of moving the wwn sharing between the hosts. Is it really possible? My doubt is that the moving pool will be hosted on a different wwn, so I can't see a way for the vmware host to see it again once it's moved. Any idea? Mybe this is not the correct way to go? Thanks for any help, Gabriele ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon illumos-discuss | Archives | Modify Your Subscription
------------------------------------------- illumos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175430-2e6923be Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175430&id_secret=21175430-6a77cda4 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com