On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Joerg Schilling <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Do you really support that a single person should be able to add code
> without a
> code review or after a code review did identify bugs?
>

Integration requires code review. One issue we do have is that we could do
with more code reviewers.

As a statistic, here is (roughly) the distribution of how many reviewers per
commit.

0 12
1 483
2 1316
3 884
4 437
5 139
6 59
7 13
8 14
9 3
15 1

There's clearly a peak at 2-3 reviewers. I suspect that for many simple
changes
people see it's been reviewed and move on.

(Of the 12 with no reviews, 10 are post-commit fixups, 1 is a typo in the
commit
message, only 1 [5524] appears to have no reviewers listed.)

This would be really sad news.
> > > Important should be that there is a need for a common repository that
> > > includes
> > > SVr4 package meta data, because otherwise only the IPS fans are
> satisfied.
> > This sounds only sensible in theory, as long as the meta data for SVR
> > packages is enough to produce more package formats than just svr4, e.g.
> > deb/rpm (if such a beast is needed)
>
> I know of no meta data that is missing in the SV package format. Even if
> there
> was something missing, we could easily add it as the format is open to
> (even private) enhancements.
>

There's nothing missing from the IPS format either, and that's trivial to
convert
to other formats. It's just much easier to only maintain the metadata once.


> The advantage of the format is that it supports a split / and /usr and
> this is
> something I do not like to miss for future options.
>

Split / and /usr is completely unrelated to packaging.

(It's not a terribly good idea, but it's equally possible with any
packaging system.)

-- 
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/

------------------------------------------
illumos-discuss
Archives: 
https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/discussions/T784fc87098d66577-M25af43d2d917e6294744051f
Powered by Topicbox: https://topicbox.com

Reply via email to