your confusion is shared Andrei. I think the cause has more to do with the term web2.0.
Running a little contrary to Tim O'Reilly's original thinking is this alternate view from Nova Spivak : http://tinyurl.com/36byj9 http://novaspivack.typepad.com/RadarNetworksTowardsAWebOS.jpg Basing it on a timeline is a much more robust definition that we can measure/define sites against. Gloria: "Elliot Jay presented his view that the "Web2.0 look" is something that needs to be destroyed" We should never look back, its distracts from the now. No more hobo rounded corners darlinks! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M68ndaZSKa8 I wonder if we'll see some sort of parallel with the fashion world, trend setting centers of design, whats in and whats out... and if that also means Web1.0 is the equivalent of the 80's - the decade that shall never be mentioned. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=24104 ________________________________________________________________ *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah* February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
