On 7/1/13 5:20 PM, David Lang wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Chris Ess wrote: >> >> I think Aleksey Tsalolikhin wanted to do something with SA-BOK. See >> https://lopsa.org/content/sabok (As an aside, does anyone know of a >> mirror for SA-BOK? The links at that URL don't appear to be working.) >> >> If LOPSA shouldn't maintain something like SA-BOK, who would? > > We need some way of gathering pointers to existing documents and articles.
I feel like the solution is to make it a group effort and rely on members of the community to submit pointers and other contributions. That leads to other problems, like making sure people think to make contributions and making the contribution system simple and easy. (Examples could be a form on a website, an email address, and, say, a plugin for lopsabot.) > The question is who will do the work to gather the pointers, > let alone reviewing things to make sure they are still relavent (and > dealing with the inevitable disagreements that will come up :-) Coming up with reviewers is the harder part. Since it would almost have to be a purely voluntary effort, we'd need a passionate group of people or enough people so that if some aren't available for life/work/etc. isuses, work can still continue. I suppose there's always the wiki approach. Something like http://c2.com/cgi/wiki comes to mind, at least for gathering and vetting documents/articles/etc. -- Chris Ess http://www.ithiriel.com _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
