On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Will Dennis <[email protected]>wrote:
> Huhwat? Maybe I'm just slow on this sleepy Saturday, but plz explain what > you mean... > I've already said it at least once in this thread, obviously to no point whatsoever. People work better with, and relate better to, small groups. Something run by some nebulous conceptually-distant large entity is, no matter what, going to be subconsciously judged by that and not objectively. Unfortunately sysadmins are mostly certain that they're more evolved and beyond such concerns. Sometimes I think this is precisely why LOPSA is perceived as not actually doing very much: firstly because as a big "distant" thing it is automatically judged as less directly relevant to an individual, and secondly because the people trying to do things within LOPSA assume that actions at the level of LOPSA are automatically going to be judged as just as good as or better than "wasteful" (a word bandied about several times int his thread) actions at a more conceptually local level. (This is not unique to LOPSA either.) -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates [email protected] [email protected] unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
