We had a problem with a Dell server with on-board 10GbE SFP+ did not want
to negotiate properly with a HP switch over a HP DAC cable. Convincing HP
that it wasn't a server-side problem, and Dell that it wasn't a
switch/cable problem, was so much work that we just gave up on DAC and
switched to fiber or 10GBASE-T.

Skylar

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Edmund White <[email protected]> wrote:

> With SFP+ DAC, you only really need to so with the switch in terms of
> compatibility. E.g. Use HP-coded transceivers.
>
> --
> Edmund White
> [email protected]
> 847-530-1605
>
> From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Skylar Thompson <
> [email protected]>
> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 3:44 AM
> To: Doug Hughes <[email protected]>
> Cc: Lopsa Discussion <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [lopsa-discuss] Question on 10GB cabling in a server room
>
> We've tried using SFP+ DAC cabling, but found managing compatibility to be
> pretty challenging. Unlike fiber, you are locked into having the same
> transceiver brand at both ends. We have HP switches at the core but mostly
> Dell servers, which proved to be problematic.
>
> Skylar
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Doug Hughes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> We mostly stick with SFP+ based switches and use SFP+ DAC, Active
>> Optical, or fiber, depending upon distance. The switches are a bit cheaper,
>> use less power, and have more connectivity options. But, if you need to
>> leverage your existing copper infrastructure for some reason, then the RJ45
>> connections are probably your best bet. If you are talking about server
>> room, I'd stick with SFP+. $.02, YMMV
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Skylar Thompson <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> The two drawbacks I'm aware of with Cat6a are that it's much heavier
>>> than Cat6, and much less flexible. Using twisted-pair has the advantage
>>> over fiber of being a bit cheaper (no separate transceivers needed) and a
>>> little denser (at least for our switch modules).
>>>
>>> Skylar
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:59 AM, John Stoffel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> >>>>> "Ski" == Ski Kacoroski <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>
>>>> Ski> We are rewiring our server room to support 10GB.  The folks we
>>>> Ski> talked to initially said that for the relatively short distances
>>>> Ski> in the server room (less that 100ft) we can get by with cat 6
>>>> Ski> cabling for the patch cables from device to patch panel and
>>>> Ski> probably even between patch panels because the distance is so
>>>> Ski> short.  The installer is saying that he will not certify that we
>>>> Ski> will get 10GB unless we use cat 6A every where because of its
>>>> Ski> shielding that stops alien crosstalk.
>>>>
>>>> I guess I wonder what the cost difference is between Cat6 and Cat6a
>>>> is, and why you're not going with the better cable, just to make sure
>>>> you don't have wonky problems down the line?
>>>>
>>>> I must admit that we've mostly just run fibre for 10g connections.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Discuss mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
>>>>  http://lopsa.org/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
>>>  http://lopsa.org/
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
>>  http://lopsa.org/
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to