Hi Ivan, Here are my thoughts on this topic:
- I agree opendaylight is better name than karaf for the opendaylight karaf distribution artifact. - So far the karaf artifact = managed distribution generated by autorelease project vs the opendaylight artifact = self managed distribution manually generated when TPCE released. - Going forward there is no point to maintain separated self managed distribution so this is why we reverted to use karaf artifact. - The idea of simply renaming the karaf artifact to opendaylight seems straight forward except for the fact that the system test framework (JJB + robot) uses karaf artifact by default. So in order to have opendaylight named distribution, I would do one of these: 1) Simply rename the karaf artifact as you say but make sure CSIT is ready for the new name. I believe there is some framework to use opendaylight vs karaf in CSIT but it needs to be tested: see (karaf-version: odl) in this example: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/gitweb?p=releng/builder.git;a=blob;f=jjb/integration/integration-test-jobs.yaml#l96 <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/gitweb?p=releng/builder.git;a=blob;f=jjb/integration/integration-test-jobs.yaml#l96> 2) If the above does not work or it is hard to change CSIT to use opendaylight name, I would keep karaf artifact for system test and I would generate extra opendaylight artifact in AR by simply moving the opendaylight module to the managed profile here: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/gitweb?p=integration/distribution.git;a=blob;f=pom.xml#l59 <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/gitweb?p=integration/distribution.git;a=blob;f=pom.xml#l59> Also in either case, if you want AR to produce the opendaylight distribution, you have to use original version schema: 0.X.Y vs X.Y.0 because AR only deals with the first AFAIR. Let me know if you have questions. BR/Luis > On May 3, 2023, at 8:16 AM, Ivan Hrasko <ivan.hra...@pantheon.tech> wrote: > > Hello, > > Some time ago - ODL distributions were called opendaylight-<VERSION>, now > they are karaf-<VERSION>. > This change is effective since transportpce is no longer a self-managed > project. > For this I have prepared: > https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/distribution/+/105774 > <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/distribution/+/105774>. > > In order to call them opendaylight again we have to run a build in > "opendaylight" project. > For this I have bumped its version here: > https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/distribution/+/105775 > <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/integration/distribution/+/105775>. > > In addition, IMO we could potentially remove the "opendaylight" project > (there are no more self-managed projects) and rename the "karaf" project to > "opendaylight". > Just to have a distro called opendaylight-<VERSION> again :D. > > What do you think? > > -- > Ivan Hraško > > Senior Software Engineer > > > PANTHEON .tech > > Mlynské Nivy 56, 821 05 Bratislava > > Slovakia > > Tel / +421 220 665 111 > > > MAIL / ivan.hra...@pantheon.team > > WEB / https://pantheon.tech <https://pantheon.tech/> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#8970): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/Discuss/message/8970 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/98664079/21656 Group Owner: discuss+ow...@lists.opendaylight.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/Discuss/leave/4219721/21656/1056093597/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
