same for me - I stumbled over this page after a hint from Markus - and
nobody ever asked us to have a look over it or send an email.
Arnulf Christl (aka Seven) wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 15:28 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote:
Rafal Wawer ha scritto:
Hi Jovi,
For a start you can take a look at the evaluation results of CASCADOSS
project - you will find there also other types of FOSS4G software too.
http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=16&Itemid=16
<http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=16&Itemid=16>
The evaluation is a bit out of date - valid for early 2008, but the
evaluation method itself may provide the clues how to look at and
compare FOSS4G software projects.
I am wondering if the GeoServer report was submitted to the GeoServer
community for double checking? I've noticed a few errors in the report
(even for beginning 2008).
For example we had in-build testing since spring 2007, the project
was already more than 5 years old in 2008 and so on.
Cheers
Andrea
Andrea,
I also noticed some inconsistencies and omissions in that document. This
is the general problem with canned information that has not been passed
by the relevant communities. It would be much easier to have this type
of documents available in an editable format like a Wiki. I wonder why
OSGeo has not got around to producing something similar? It is obviously
a hard task but if we (OSGeo folks) do not manage to get it done well,
who will?
Best regards,
Arnulf.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
