Agreed on it being a hassle. However the OSGeo foundation also has a responsibility to users - who *really* want to see a feature list and to be able to compare projects. The foundation can take steps to help projects communicate - and this is the task/mandate of the marketing committee.
Competition and Collaboration are both key. I am also happy to see the marketing committee engaging with projects directly; I hope they also have some volunteer hours for writing and are not expecting developers to step away from their core responsibility to the codebase. Jody On 06/06/2010, at 10:14 AM, Jason Birch wrote: > Wow, I'm really having opinions this week :) > > IMHO getting into rating projects is just asking for trouble, infighting, > bitterness, and people/projects walking away from OSGeo. > > Jason > > On 5 June 2010 16:37, Cameron Shorter wrote: > Andrea and others, does this fit with people's expectations? > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
