The geonames ontology looks like it might work for me. I'll read it over tomorrow.
Thanks for the suggestion. Landon Sent from my iPhone On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:45 PM, "Ian Turton" <ijtur...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Christopher Schmidt > <crschm...@crschmidt.net> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 05:18:47PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: >>> "All attempts to construct simple ontologies end up reinventing RDF" . ? >> >> That was actually my first thought when I saw this: "Hey look, >> someone else reinventing RDFa!" :) >> >> Seriously, I say this with a bit of knowledge; I mean, after all, >> I sort of work on making places searchable on maps. For a company >> with a pretty big set of data about the hierarchy of the world. >> It's a lot fuzzier than you think :) >> >> Also, Landon, I do highly recommend looking into RDF -- specifically, >> RDFa -- because I think it's heading in a very similar direction to >> what you're describing, without the need for some all-world-hierarchy >> to tie it to, which might actually help you get a bit further. > > > You might want to look at http://www.geonames.org/ontology/ which RDFs > the GeoNames database. > > Ian > -- > Ian Turton > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss Warning: Information provided via electronic media is not guaranteed against defects including translation and transmission errors. If the reader is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
