There is a third model; the ISO19107 model that deals with a few more things; it is however object oriented in nature....
-- Jody Garnett On Wednesday, 13 July 2011 at 6:36 PM, Pieter De Graef wrote: > Hi everyone, > > for the Geomajas project, we are looking into separating the Geometry > functionality into an independent project. In other words, I am talking about > a Geometry project for the Web. This code would be written in Java for GWT > and thus be available on Java backends as well as client environments (we > intend to add a JavaScript wrapper around the GWT code). > > Now the problem that I'm facing here, is which model to follow.... > > On one hand there is the Simple Feature Specification which is clearly an > Object Oriented model with the advantage that it is well known but is also > more difficult to implement the JavaScript wrapper around. > > On the other hand we could follow a service based model (more like SFS for > SQL) which is easier to get up and running, easier to create a JavaScript > wrapper for and easier to translate into web services. > > As it's difficult for us to chose and as it's a pretty crucial decision for > the future of the Geomajas project, I as wondering how you guys feel about > this. > > Kind regards, > > Pieter De Graef > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org (mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org) > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
