The GeoTools documentation is not extensive - as we treat WFS like any other 
"datastore". 

- http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/library/data/wfs.html
- http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/library/data/wfs-ng.html

The only limitation is that WFS-T support is only provided for WFS 1.0 (and you 
need to start a transaction so we have a place to store the Transaction request 
as it is constructed). You can proceed to work with your uncommitted 
transaction locally (simulating a database transaction by processing in your 
local changes with the live results coming back from the WFS). This is handy if 
you want to do some QA prior it to hitting transaction.commit() and submitting 
your request to the WFS.

The module is considered unsupported as there is no funded developer working on 
it; even though it is a popular feature support for OGC standards is not 
considered sexy enough to attract money or volunteers.
-- 
Jody Garnett


On Wednesday, 17 August 2011 at 7:29 PM, Markus Schneider wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I am looking for WFS client implementations for accessing generic WFS
> servers. Something that allows me to access WFS services from my own
> code without having to deal with the protocol details. Primarily, I am
> looking for Java implementations, but I am also interested in other
> implementations
> 
> I did a quick Google search, but didn't find anything really
> interesting. I am pretty sure that GeoTools must have such a thing?
> Geotk? Can someone point me to the JavaDoc?
> 
> Any hints appreciated,
> Markus
> 
> -- 
> l a t / l o n GmbH
> Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany
> phone ++49 +228 18496-0 fax ++49 +228 18496-29
> http://www.lat-lon.de http://www.deegree.org
> Follow deegree on Twitter: http://twitter.com/deegree_org
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org (mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org)
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to