Margherita, sorry I missed part of the info. When it is supposed to be
the workshop?
In Florence I have also the NASA WW challenge and therefore, as told,
I have to verify if I'm free or not when there is the workshop.
Many thanks!
Maria
Def. Quota Margherita Di Leo <dileomargher...@gmail.com>:
Hi,
thank you for your thoughts. I'm a bit surprised that I didn't hear from
other co-authors. At this point I would like to know who is planning to be
there at the workshop anyway.
Thanks
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Simone Giannecchini <
simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
Ciao Jachym,
a few clarifications below...
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013! Visit
http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Jachym Cepicky
<jachym.cepi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Madi,
>
> I still did not obtain any confirmation mail about proposed presentation
> - do you know by chance, how far the process is?
>
> As for the workshop, it seems odd to combine MapStore as concrete
> product with whole OSGeo stack and more dialogue-based workshop.
>
> I see them as two different topics for completely different auditorium.
> I would understand, that MapStore people would feel upset, if they would
> have to share their time with "pure" OSGeo.
>
> From my point of view, all decisions are bad (except having two full
> workshops accepted). I think, that the best option would than be to
> share the time with MapStore and gladly accept their offer kind 30:60
> (rather 60:30 - OSGeo in general, MapStore as concrete example of local
> company using and developing OSGeo projects), if possible.
>
That was exactly my proposal :)
We also had to try and find a decent title as having two different
workshops using portions of the same time seemed misleading and
actually contraddicted what was asked from
the organizers. Therefore I suggested to split the time giving
precedence to the OSGEO based discussion and then hold the MapStore
workshop at the end.
> NOTE: This is nothing against MapStore. I wish them all the best and I
> think, they deserve full workshop time slot as well. INSPIRE conference
> committee forses us to compete as international organization with
> semi-local company (GeoSolution). This is simply not all right (or do I
> see it completely wrong?)
>
Well, life isn't perfect and we need to live with what we are while we
try to change things :)
I believe the solution we are proposing here is Ok (not perfect I
admit) as I believe leaves enough room for discussion
as well as as enough room for us (as in GeoSolutions) for showing a
bit of what we do.
> I also think, this shows us, that OSGeo is not taken seriously as
> important partner to conference committee of INSPIRE conference and that
> brings me back to our SDI committee proposed earlier - I have to push it
> little bit further (I do not like pushing to hard, though).
>
> Thanks
>
> Jachym
>
> Dne 20.5.2013 15:47, Margherita Di Leo napsal(a):
>> Dear All,
>>
>> as correspondent author for the workshop proposal [1], I received an
email
>> from the INSPIRE Conference Organisers. Unfortunately, due to time and
>> space limitations, it is possible for them to only choose a small
number of
>> the submitted workshops to appear in the programme. Therefore their
request
>> was to combine, if possible, our workshop with the one submitted by
Simone
>> Giannecchini and Tobia Di Pisa:
>>
>> "Hands-on Introduction to create mash-ups for INSPIRE Services with
>> MapStore"
>>
>> Simone was in cc in this email.
>> I just had a Skype talk with Simone, and we individuated a couple of
>> possible scenarios:
>>
>> 1) Withdraw one of the two workshops; or
>> 2) Split the 90 minutes at our disposal in two.
>>
>> Of course this decision is up to all the co-authors. In case we decide
for
>> the second solution, Simone kindly offered to shrink his time to 30
>> minutes, in order to allow the round table to take place in 60 minutes
>> comfortably.
>>
>> Another request from the committee was to delineate a new title for the
>> workshop, and the proposal would be something like:
>>
>> "Ping-Pong match: OSGeo & INSPIRE (with a practical intro to using
MapStore
>> for INSPIRE Services mashups)"
>>
>> Of course also this is open to discussion.
>>
>> Please let me know ASAP your reaction.
>>
>> Thank you and best regards,
>>
>> Margherita
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [1]
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Workshop_proposal
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
> --
> Jachym Cepicky
> Help Service - Remote Sensing s.r.o.
> jachym.cepi...@gmail.com
> HS-RS: jac...@hsrs.cz http://bnhelp.cz
> http://les-ejk.cz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
--
Best regards,
Margherita DI LEO
Postdoctoral Researcher
European Commission - DG JRC
Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES)
Via Fermi, 2749
I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261
Tel. +39 0332 78 3600
margherita.di-...@jrc.ec.europa.eu
Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not
in any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the
European Commission.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
