Hi all, same here, as said in the beginning I'm unfortunately not able to travel but will contribute material mainly from MapServer as needed.
cu Stephan On 05/21/2013 08:45 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry for my later reply. > I agree with the suggested solution to split the workshop time, I don't > see another way to do this. > > As we discussed in the initial hangout, unfortunately I won't be able to > attend, but I will contribute with workshop material. > > Best regards, > Angelos > > On 05/21/2013 09:23 PM, Margherita Di Leo wrote: >> Hi, >> >> thank you for your thoughts. I'm a bit surprised that I didn't hear from >> other co-authors. At this point I would like to know who is planning to be >> there at the workshop anyway. >> >> Thanks >> >> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Simone Giannecchini < >> simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: >> >>> Ciao Jachym, >>> a few clarifications below... >>> >>> Regards, >>> Simone Giannecchini >>> == >>> GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013! Visit >>> http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information. >>> == >>> >>> Ing. Simone Giannecchini >>> @simogeo >>> Founder/Director >>> >>> GeoSolutions S.A.S. >>> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 >>> 55054 Massarosa (LU) >>> Italy >>> phone: +39 0584 962313 >>> fax: +39 0584 1660272 >>> mob: +39 333 8128928 >>> >>> http://www.geo-solutions.it >>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Jachym Cepicky >>> <jachym.cepi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi Madi, >>>> >>>> I still did not obtain any confirmation mail about proposed presentation >>>> - do you know by chance, how far the process is? >>>> >>>> As for the workshop, it seems odd to combine MapStore as concrete >>>> product with whole OSGeo stack and more dialogue-based workshop. >>>> >>>> I see them as two different topics for completely different auditorium. >>>> I would understand, that MapStore people would feel upset, if they would >>>> have to share their time with "pure" OSGeo. >>>> >>>> From my point of view, all decisions are bad (except having two full >>>> workshops accepted). I think, that the best option would than be to >>>> share the time with MapStore and gladly accept their offer kind 30:60 >>>> (rather 60:30 - OSGeo in general, MapStore as concrete example of local >>>> company using and developing OSGeo projects), if possible. >>>> >>> That was exactly my proposal :) >>> We also had to try and find a decent title as having two different >>> workshops using portions of the same time seemed misleading and >>> actually contraddicted what was asked from >>> the organizers. Therefore I suggested to split the time giving >>> precedence to the OSGEO based discussion and then hold the MapStore >>> workshop at the end. >>> >>> >>>> NOTE: This is nothing against MapStore. I wish them all the best and I >>>> think, they deserve full workshop time slot as well. INSPIRE conference >>>> committee forses us to compete as international organization with >>>> semi-local company (GeoSolution). This is simply not all right (or do I >>>> see it completely wrong?) >>>> >>> Well, life isn't perfect and we need to live with what we are while we >>> try to change things :) >>> I believe the solution we are proposing here is Ok (not perfect I >>> admit) as I believe leaves enough room for discussion >>> as well as as enough room for us (as in GeoSolutions) for showing a >>> bit of what we do. >>> >>>> I also think, this shows us, that OSGeo is not taken seriously as >>>> important partner to conference committee of INSPIRE conference and that >>>> brings me back to our SDI committee proposed earlier - I have to push it >>>> little bit further (I do not like pushing to hard, though). >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Jachym >>>> >>>> Dne 20.5.2013 15:47, Margherita Di Leo napsal(a): >>>>> Dear All, >>>>> >>>>> as correspondent author for the workshop proposal [1], I received an >>> email >>>>> from the INSPIRE Conference Organisers. Unfortunately, due to time and >>>>> space limitations, it is possible for them to only choose a small >>> number of >>>>> the submitted workshops to appear in the programme. Therefore their >>> request >>>>> was to combine, if possible, our workshop with the one submitted by >>> Simone >>>>> Giannecchini and Tobia Di Pisa: >>>>> >>>>> "Hands-on Introduction to create mash-ups for INSPIRE Services with >>>>> MapStore" >>>>> >>>>> Simone was in cc in this email. >>>>> I just had a Skype talk with Simone, and we individuated a couple of >>>>> possible scenarios: >>>>> >>>>> 1) Withdraw one of the two workshops; or >>>>> 2) Split the 90 minutes at our disposal in two. >>>>> >>>>> Of course this decision is up to all the co-authors. In case we decide >>> for >>>>> the second solution, Simone kindly offered to shrink his time to 30 >>>>> minutes, in order to allow the round table to take place in 60 minutes >>>>> comfortably. >>>>> >>>>> Another request from the committee was to delineate a new title for the >>>>> workshop, and the proposal would be something like: >>>>> >>>>> "Ping-Pong match: OSGeo & INSPIRE (with a practical intro to using >>> MapStore >>>>> for INSPIRE Services mashups)" >>>>> >>>>> Of course also this is open to discussion. >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know ASAP your reaction. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you and best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Margherita >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013#Workshop_proposal _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss