On 12/04/2013 08:00 AM, Barry Rowlingson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Jo Cook <joc...@astuntechnology.com> wrote: >> There's already a repository for 2013 at >> http://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/2013/ it has some files in it (mainly bid >> documents at present that I uploaded at the start of the process). I'm >> currently wgetting the basecamp project that we were using, so I can verify >> that we will also be archiving that- however until it finishes I don't know >> how much disk space it's going to take up. > > Okay, so as long as OSGeo isn't bothered with over 300Mb of map > gallery binaries (which shouldn't change) being upped there I'll get > on with it. > > Barry
The size in general is not an issue. You're right that sticking that much in svn is usually a pain, but not if it's one time deal. This is a good question for the System Admin Committee to ponder though. I think most people would want a static clone of the site in some way to continue to exist, and we do have servers we can put that on. So under this plan you would put it in svn, and we would checkout the subfolder to a web server and serve up the static copy. Let's see if anyone else has a better idea this week. Thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
