On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Alex Mandel <tech_...@wildintellect.com> wrote:
> The size in general is not an issue. You're right that sticking that > much in svn is usually a pain, but not if it's one time deal. This is a > good question for the System Admin Committee to ponder though. I think > most people would want a static clone of the site in some way to > continue to exist, and we do have servers we can put that on. > > So under this plan you would put it in svn, and we would checkout the > subfolder to a web server and serve up the static copy. > That's great, because I think the ..................s that SVN is printing out right now are nearly finished... I didn't realise there already was an SVN for the conference, or even that I had write access to it. Once SVN stops spitting dots at me you should see it here: http://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/2013/website/ and apart from not displaying index.html files on directories I reckon it should be almost usable from that URL. Of course it will be happier when stuck on an apache box with its domain name.... thanks Barry _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
