Hi Charlie,

I actually get your point of view, and tend to agree with it.

Best regards,
Bart

> On 24 Jun 2015, at 13:42, Charles Schweik <cschw...@pubpol.umass.edu> wrote:
> 
> OK, I raised the question of appropriate content to Jeff after I looked at 
> the FOSS4G website for a reference for a grant proposal I am writing at a 
> time when I was thinking specifically about diversity recruitment to 
> GeoForAll. 
> 
> By asking Jeff about it offline, I was raising the question that those slides 
> could turn some women off who are considering attending and I think those 
> kinds of signals are moving the community the wrong direction, and that 
> perhaps the author should consider this. I raised this because I have been in 
> conferences where I've witnessed women being offended by things happening on 
> stage and I think as a community we want to be sensitive to this since we are 
> hopeful for more women to become engaged in FOSS4G.
> 
> From my eye going through the slides, I didn't understand (and still don't) 
> why zoom in on the Dali image needed to be on the slideshow. After a more 
> careful examination -- that other viewers won't likely do -- I see that the 
> first slide is an enlargement of part of that painting and then a second 
> picture of it hanging in some building, under the group heading of 'Seoul is 
> far away.' I still don't get why the enlargement is needed... but perhaps 
> that is just me. But I think I am still right -- some women might be turned 
> off to the conference by that zoom-in. 
> 
> Sangee, your explanation of the side of the female models is helpful. But 
> some people around the world will not understand it or misinterpret its 
> meaning or why it is there. The 'Culture' heading helps I suppose. So at 
> least consider having something on those slides explaining to readers what 
> they represent better than they do currently. 
> 
> I'll close by saying, with all due respect to Sanghee and the others in this 
> community who disagree with me, is that if you are trying to encourage people 
> to come, and especially if your email footer says 'Towards Diversity' as a 
> goal of the conference, then the 'Precautionary Principle' might be wise to 
> follow. If I was doing the advertising to recruit people, I'd be conservative 
> and wouldn't put up imagery that could turn off potential attendees.
> 
> I'm not advocating any kind of censorship here, and I am not judging whether 
> a COC is necessary or not. I just was simply raising a concern about 
> underlying or subtle messages embedded in a 'commercial' being used to 
> recruit people to our global conference. 
> 
> It appears that others disagree with this view. 
> 
> Charlie Schweik 
>   
> 
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Pedro-Juan Ferrer Matoses 
> <pfer...@osgeo.org <mailto:pfer...@osgeo.org>> wrote:
> Hello Sanghee,
> 
> > I was asked to remove a few slides from my presentation "7 Reasons why you 
> > should come to FOSS4G 2015 Seoul”[1], which is at the main page of FOSS4G 
> > Seoul, as being possibly offensive to women. Specifically to say, slide #6 
> > (nude female in painting) and slide #20 (row of female models) are those 
> > controversial ones.
> 
> I'd like to have a little bit more of context to make up my mind
> 
> * Who asked to remove the slides?
> 
> * Is «being possibily offensive to women» the only reason it was given to you?
> 
> On the other hand, obviously you have you own reasons to keep the
> slides, but those reasons are not clear in the presentation because it
> lacks of... well, it lacks of someone *explaining* what are we seeing.
> 
> May be a less-dependant-on-someone-explaining-presentation is more
> suitable for being in the landing page of the Conference.
> 
> But this is just my POV.
> 
> Best regards,
> --
> Pedro-Juan Ferrer Matoses
> Valencia (España)
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss 
> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Charlie Schweik
> 
> Associate Professor, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
> Dept of Environmental Conservation and Center for Public Policy and 
> Administration
> 
> Personal website: http://people.umass.edu/cschweik 
> <http://people.umass.edu/cschweik>
> Publications: http://works.bepress.com/charles_schweik/ 
> <http://works.bepress.com/charles_schweik/>
> 
> Author, Internet Success: A Study of Open Source Software (MIT Press, 2012) - 
> see http://tinyurl.com/d3e4545 <http://tinyurl.com/d3e4545>
> 
> --------------------------------------------
> Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
> A: http://five.sentenc.es 
> <http://five.sentenc.es/>_______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to