Thx Cameron for your positive feed back!

I guess Gert Jan and I - from the perspective of our involvement in marketing 
FOSS4G in Bonn - are running into all sorts of 
questions/expectations/thresholds/legacies/assumptions/undecided items and the 
like. Thus our own questions and remarks and at least often in my case; 
exasperation.

I will involve myself with drafting a concept marketing doc for us in the wiki 
in the upcoming time. Making use of what seems reusable where appropriate. And 
everybody is invited to discuss, comment and ask!!!
I will probably ask the community some tough questions beforehand ;-)
@Nicolas/Gert Jan: hopefully you can actively write and contribute!?!?

(However, I will not involve myself with the present promotional 
aspects/agenda-2016. Although I agree that the train needs to move on, I am 
just better suited to work from a solid and agreed foundation/design.)

Vriendelijke groet,
Marc Vloemans


> Op 18 mrt. 2016 om 12:27 heeft Cameron Shorter <cameron.shor...@gmail.com> 
> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> Nicolas, Marc,
> You both have proposed some excellent ideas on what we should do within the 
> marketing committee, and I think you are also offering to make it happen? 
> Thank you.
> 
> I suggest put your ideas into the existing marketing wiki, as linked from 
> here: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Marketing_Committee
> 
> I suggest not being scared to archive old content. Maybe initially move under 
> an "Old Material" heading, with strikeout font, or move to an "archive" wiki 
> page, and eventually remove all together. Some of this old content I've 
> created, and I'll be delighted to see it ruthlessly refreshed and improved in 
> the ways you've suggested.
> 
> I expect that once you put draft ideas together with a commitment to move it 
> forward, you will attract positive feedback, and likely attract more 
> volunteers.
> 
> I don't think it matters much whether you work under the banner of "marketing 
> committee", "web committee" or "conference committee". The key element is 
> that something gets done. We are volunteers, and we are effective as a 
> "do-ocracy".
> 
> So please feel empowered, and start putting your ideas into the wiki. Ask for 
> feedback. It is always easier to discuss an idea after someone has writing a 
> first draft. I'd love to see what you suggest.
> 
> Warm regards, Cameron
> 
>> On 18/03/2016 10:11 am, Jody Garnett wrote:
>> Thanks for the clarity Marc, there is a very different focus between the two 
>> activities.
>> 
>> My two-cents is what we need here - and what Cameron asked for at the start 
>> of the thread - is volunteers to put time on the table. OSGeo is a volunteer 
>> organization, please in pitch in to make it great.
>> 
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>> 
>>> On 17 March 2016 at 09:37, Marc VLOEMANS <marcvloema...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> All
>>>  
>>> If this year's marketing communication and budget is reflecting last 
>>> year's, then that's of course a discretionary Board decision.
>>> To combine WebCom and MarkCom can in that case be a practical solution, for 
>>> now...
>>>  
>>> However, to combine them more permanently would downgrade the 'Art of 
>>> Marketing' 
>>> to just 'Promotion'. And would not emply the total toolbox at our disposal 
>>> to grow usage of 
>>> FOSS for GIS. Marketing can be so much more...
>>>  
>>> In order to really benefit from all marketing has to offer, we need to have 
>>> established at a minimum level:
>>> - what are our offerings/products/services and their added end value?
>>> - what is (are) our target segment audience(s), direct and indirect for the 
>>> above?
>>> - how do we create interest for it/these (the promotional aspect) per 
>>> target group?
>>> - how/via which appropriate channels do we distribute that 
>>> offering-product-service (incl OSGeo-Live)
>>> - which community members/orgs/externals/partners/suppliers are to be 
>>> involved
>>> - what are available timelines, resources and deliverables?
>>> And these questions-answers are to be addressed interdependently in a 
>>> single coherent approach.
>>>  
>>> If such approach is considered too far fetched...then just have a single 
>>> Com 
>>> for the future, focusing on promotional aspects and media; 'PromCom'.
>>>  
>>> Not my preferred choice, though ;-)
>>>  
>>>  
>>> Marc Vloemans
>>> 
>>> Kind regards,
>>> 
>>> Marc Vloemans
>>> 
>>> Mobile +31(0)651 844262
>>> LinkedIn: http://nl.linkedin.com/in/marcvloemans
>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/marcvloemans
>>> http://www.slideshare.net/marcvloemans
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2016-03-17 12:45 GMT+01:00 Gert-Jan van der Weijden (OSGeo.nl) 
>>> <gert-...@osgeo.nl>:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> The website is a tool, just as OSGeo-Live is a tool.
>>>> The 2 committees (WebCom and MarkCom) are closely related.
>>>> 
>>>> In  my opinion MarkCom set the goals and probably defines what tools are 
>>>> needed to reach these goals.
>>>> WebCom makes sure  one of these tools is up and running.
>>>> That requires different skill, which makes it a valid choice to keep the 2 
>>>> committees separated.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Gert-Jan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Venkatesh Raghavan schreef op 16-03-2016 7:53:
>>>>> On 3/16/2016 3:00 PM, Massimiliano Cannata wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think that nicolas ideas are fully right. Website is one of the
>>>>>> best
>>>>>> marketing tool.
>>>>>> Maybe making one committee from two dormient make one awake... could
>>>>>> we
>>>>>> consider to join webcom and marketing in a new one?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I also think that merging web and marketing committees would make a
>>>>> lot
>>>>> of sense.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best
>>>>> 
>>>>> Venka
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Maxi
>>>>>> Il 15/Mar/2016 21:39, "Jody Garnett" <jody.garn...@gmail.com> ha
>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks Cameron & Nick, could you start outlining a "reboot" on the
>>>>>> wiki
>>>>>> and grab an agenda item for next months board meeting? We also have
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> hangout/workparty for board members (and officers?) in case you want
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> companionship shaping the wiki page.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jody Garnett
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 15 March 2016 at 04:38, nicolas bozon <nicolas.bo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dear Cameron, Marketing Committee, OSGeo Directors,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> As a member of the so called "dormant"                               
>>>>>> Marketing Committee, i would
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> glad to help revitalising it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In fact it hasn't been a satisfactory nor confortable situation to
>>>>>> be a
>>>>>> member of such a forgotten commitee since 2012.
>>>>>> So i'd like to volunteer for championing such committee reboot, and
>>>>>> propose to help define strategic changes, recruit new members and
>>>>>> tackle
>>>>>> some of the administrative tasks.
>>>>>> I can also chair the Committee if needed, and if this is
>>>>>> appropriated for
>>>>>> gathering the troops. Cameron, I am not                               
>>>>>> Santa (but 'Klaus' only:)),
>>>>>> but I'd
>>>>>> be very glad to learn from your experience and we may try to enhance
>>>>>> things
>>>>>> together.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> However,i think the commitee's mission and role should be revised,
>>>>>> probably indepth modified, and aligned with the new OSGeo plans.
>>>>>> My main point is that the mandate of the OSGeo Marketing Committee
>>>>>> must
>>>>>> go way beyond the funding of OSGeo events and the managment of
>>>>>> consumables
>>>>>> or swag, as it mostly did (or not) until now.
>>>>>> OSGeo Live is one of our best marketing tool to showcase some of the
>>>>>> Foundation's software projects, but not to promote and market the
>>>>>> Foundation itself IMHO.
>>>>>> OSGeo Live must of course be kept inside a new marketing plan, but
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> latter shouldn't be built on DVDs and events only.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> According to me, improving OSGeo Marketing globally is one of the
>>>>>> most
>>>>>> important and urgent action to be taken                               
>>>>>> according to the new
>>>>>> strategic plan
>>>>>> defined by the Board.
>>>>>> It must help OSGeo to be presented as more matured, more inclusive,
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> professional, and fully considered by the broader geospatial
>>>>>> community.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I believe such reborn Marketing Committee should work closely along
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> the Board of Directors, the Website Committee and a few motivated
>>>>>> contributors, in order to:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Define a consitent OSGeo identity from existing material
>>>>>> (including
>>>>>> revised graphic guidelines, new shapes and colors aligned with
>>>>>> identified
>>>>>> needs and recent web trends, new scalable vector graphics, web fonts
>>>>>> ...)
>>>>>> - Refine the OSGeo web identity (including main site redesign
>>>>>> through the
>>>>>> developement a new drupal theme, responsive webdesign, efficient and
>>>>>> reusable visuals...)
>>>>>> - Enhance OSGeo web content and presence (including blog, journal,
>>>>>> newsletter and bring more activity on various social networks)
>>>>>> - Market the OSGeo brand online and at all kind of events (including
>>>>>> consumables management, viral marketing, direct marketing...)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Such actions could be prioritized and voted by the Committee's
>>>>>> members,
>>>>>> coordinated by the commitee's chair according to the Committee
>>>>>> members, and
>>>>>> aligned with the allocated budget and volunteered time.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I sincerly hope we can reboot and improve our Marketing Committee
>>>>>> together, in order to grow and market our Foundation better.
>>>>>> Let us talk, decide and act now ! Enough rest for MarkCom' !
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Nick
> 
>> On 15/03/2016 10:22 pm, Marc Vloemans wrote:
>> Before handing out money to undoubtedly worthy causes...a marketing (which 
>> is more than just the promotional 'P' ) plan would be the usual starting 
>> point. Agreed upon by the Board and with input from all.
>> 
>> So. Why is what is given to whom, when and to what amount? Effectively; what 
>> precedes a marketing committee.
>> 
>> Unless, a plan/framework is in place, Santa Claus/Easter Bunny/Tooth 
>> Fairy/etc. can expect to receive a lot of flak. Groups and initiatives have 
>> no clue as to what (governable) rules to comply with. Besides all sorts of 
>> unwanted chaos and misunderstandings can be expected.
>> 
>> By the way, does one also not start to code without some sort of initial and 
>> agreed plan?
>> 
>> Any volunteers besides me to have a stab at it?
>> 
>> Vriendelijke groet,
>> Marc Vloemans
>>>>>> 2016-03-15 8:42 GMT+01:00 Cameron Shorter
>>>>>> <cameron.shor...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> OSGeo needs help distributing money to worthy causes. We need an
>>>>>> OSGeo
>>>>>> Santa Clause.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The current state of play is:
>>>>>> * The OSGeo Board has allocated budget for an OSGeo marketing
>>>>>> committee
>>>>>> to distribute.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> * But, our OSGeo Marketing committee has imploded. (I was the last
>>>>>> chair, a few years back). It seems no one is interested in the
>>>>>> administrative tasks of giving away money, doing the administrative
>>>>>> work of
>>>>>> writing cheques, being accountable, deciding which requests get
>>>>>> funded
>>>>>> verses which don't based on a set of guidelines.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> My take is that handing out money to worthy marketing causes can't
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> too important, as it is not bugging anyone enough to want to step up
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> volunteer to fix it. But I'd be delighted to proven wrong, and see
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> people volunteer to step up to revitalise the OSGeo marketing
>>>>>> committee. If
>>>>>> you are possibly interested, please speak up. I'd be happy to help
>>>>>> you get
>>>>>> started.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> A first task would be to consider this request from Bob.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Warm regards, Cameron
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 9/03/2016 6:29 am, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sounds like an amazing event, marketing committee should have a
>>>>>> budget
>>>>>> to work against shortly (it is an agenda topic for this week and you
>>>>>> can
>>>>>> see the budget
>>>>> <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_of_Directors#Operational_Budget_for_2016>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> on the wiki ).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cameron is involved with both marketing committee and OSGeo live and
>>>>>> should be able to assist.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jody Garnett
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 8 March 2016 at 08:59, Bob Basques <bbasq...@sharedgeo.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> All,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I haven’t heard anything back on the following request from anyone
>>>>>> (other than Jody commenting about where this should be sent . . .).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So trying again . . .
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> All,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> First, let me know if this is the wrong list to request from.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We’re holding a regional Geo conference and would like to include
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> OSGeo-Live thumb drive in each attendees goody bag.  So, please
>>>>>> consider
>>>>>> this an official request for funding of OSGeo Live Thumb Drives for
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> event.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is a multi- discipline, multi-state event for all things Geo.
>>>>>> 60
>>>>>> confirmed presenters.  This will be a highly knowledgable audience
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> because of the varied subject matter it will be an excellent venue
>>>>>> to get
>>>>>> the word out to new folks about OSGeo and it’s mission, via the
>>>>>> OSGeo Live
>>>>>> project.  More info about the event can be seen here:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> www.umgeocon.org [2]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We’ve planned for 350 attendees.  We can make our own thumb
>>>>>> drives,
>>>>>> and/or pay to have them made ourselves.  We’ve handed these out in
>>>>>> the past
>>>>>> and will also include a getting started cheat sheet for each user to
>>>>>> get
>>>>>> them going with the least amount of effort.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I haven’t checked lately for the going rate on these.  Local
>>>>>> suppliers
>>>>>> are advertising ~$5 each for an 8GB USB3.0 blank drive.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Request is for $2000 ($1750 for Drives, $250 for copying the OSGeo
>>>>>> Live
>>>>>> suite to each).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Related, my submission of the OSGeo Live presentation has been
>>>>>> accepted
>>>>>> at the event, and there will also be a (free) GeoMOOSE workshop.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> bobb
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Bob Basques
>>>>>> <bbasq...@sharedgeo.org>bbasq...@sharedgeo.org
>>>>>> 612.598.9210
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Board mailing list
>>>>>> bo...@lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Board mailing
>>>>> listBoard@lists.osgeo.orghttp://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cameron Shorter,
>>>>>> Software and Data Solutions Manager
>>>>>> LISAsoft
>>>>>> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
>>>>>> 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com [3],  F +61 2 9009 5099
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Discuss mailing list
>>>>>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Discuss mailing list
>>>>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Discuss mailing list
>>>>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Links:
>>>>> ------
>>>>> [1] 
>>>>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_of_Directors#Operational_Budget_for_2016
>>>>> [2] http://www.umgeocon.org
>>>>> [3] http://www.lisasoft.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Discuss mailing list
>>>>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Discuss mailing list
>>>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> -- 
> Cameron Shorter,
> Software and Data Solutions Manager
> LISAsoft
> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
> 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
> 
> P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to