Dear all,

In all countries of the OECD marketing practices are regulated in one way or 
another. For instance, if I sell ear rings made out of lead I can not claim 
they are made of silver. In some cases this sort of distinction is not easy, as 
is the case with "open source" or "open".

In the European Union various mechanisms have been put in place for similar 
situations, such as the Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) [0] to label 
goods produced in specific regions (think of Port, Champagne, Scotch) or the 
Traditional Specialities Guaranteed (TSG) [1] to differentiate products crafted 
by traditional processes.

So far, organisations like the OSGeo or the FSF have focused on labelling 
projects that meet particular criteria in open source, but have not - and can 
not - prevent others from misusing the concept. This thread shows that this is 
a new path the community must trail.

I believe we need a regulatory framework for "open source" labelling; something 
like the EU regulation 1169/2011 [2] for organic farming. It not only sets the 
criteria for farmers to label their products, as it actively prevents others 
from falsely claiming to that criteria.

Regards.

[0] 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographical_indications_and_traditional_specialities_in_the_European_Union#Protected_designation_of_origin_.28PDO.29

[1] 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographical_indications_and_traditional_specialities_in_the_European_Union#Traditional_specialities_guaranteed_.28TSG.29

[2] 
https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/organic/organic-farming/what-is-organic-farming/organic-certification_en

--
Luís Moreira de Sousa
Im Grund 6
CH-8600 Dübendorf
Switzerland

Phone: +41 (0)79 812 62 65
Email: luis.de.so...@protonmail.ch
URL: https://sites.google.com/site/luismoreiradesousa
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to