Kiringai, thanks for your thoughts but I cannot quite follow your argument. Or rather, you are just reiterating an old claim by some proprietary vendors stating that their software provides more operations security /due to being developed in a proprietary model/. This claim has never been evidenced and probably cannot be proven anyway.
Please excuse me if I misunderstood your argument. Thanks, Arnulf Am 29.03.2017 um 05:50 schrieb Kiringai Kamau: > Steven this has been the experience of many corporates as theyrise the > ladder of visibility. Indeed from an operations security perspective > proprietary solutions end up being cheaper and secure making corporates > migrate to proprietary ones. > > However, if the desire is to just collect data fir value added analytics it's > best to retain the open source dynamic. Proper planning always guides the > best model to use. > > Kiringai > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 25 Mar 2017, at 20:06, Steven Feldman <shfeld...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Implementation, customisation, integration, training, ongoing support, >> maintenance and hosting are the main costs regardless of whether the >> underlying software is proprietary or open source > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- http://metaspatial.net Spatially enabling your business.
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
