Dear Michael, Your answer clarifies that OSGeo has not paid for being listed as sponsor.
This doesn't change my idea that OSGeo shouldn't be listed as a sponsor an thus I renew my request to the board for removing OSGeo from that list and from any material listing OSGeo together (at the same level and/or same list of sponsors). That's because the marketing message it brings is clearly undesired and not respectful of the true. As I said, I just noticed this yesterday otherwise I would have talked before ;-) but this doesn't change anything.. Finally, to be clear, this has nothing personal with the organisers and I understood the positive willing to give more visibility to OSGeo. I also recognize publicly the great work the Boston team is doing but this is simply wrong. Maxi Il 02 lug 2017 3:21 PM, "Michael Terner" <m...@appgeo.com> ha scritto: Maxi: I think you may misunderstand what is going on: 1. YES, OSGeo is *hosting* FOSS4G. Our opening block on the website <http://2017.foss4g.org/> *also *says "Presented by OSGeo" (using language requested by OSGeo and the OSGeo logo). 2. OSGeo did *not* pay anything for the Gold sponsorship. It was provided as an "in kind" privilege respecting the "advance" (see $'s and risk coverage) that was provided, which *is* materially very valuable. We have a couple of other "in kind" sponsors including Harvard University which is providing workshop space, and District Hall which provided a deep discount on our use of their space for the Code Sprint, and other things. 3. We described adding OSGeo as a Gold Sponsor in our proposal for hosting FOSS4G that was delivered to Conference Dev. This was a convenient and useful way for us to provide OSGeo things like a booth, and free passes which are sponsor privileges. Obviously, this is OSGeo's call and we will do what the Board wishes, but this is neither new (you were on the website as a Gold Sponsor as soon as the sponsor page went up), nor unplanned and was conveyed to OSGeo in our proposal 20 months ago. Also obviously, we think it makes sense and is accurate. I hope this helps explain things... MT On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 4:22 AM, Massimiliano Cannata < massimiliano.cann...@supsi.ch> wrote: > Dear community and board members, > Today I found out that OSGeo is a a SPONSOR of the FOSS4G-2017 Boston > conference. > > This is disappointing me ! > > At least for two reasons: > > 1- foss4g is the OSGeo's conference, so OSGeo is the host not a guest > (have you ever seen AGU sponsoring it's annual event?) > > 2- OSGeo is already providing seed and risk exposure money so it shouldn't > need to pay for get exposure or being listed in the sponsor page. > > So, as an OSGeo charter member, I formally ask the board to remove OSGeo > from the sponsor list ! > > Regards > Maxi > > _______________________________________________ > Board mailing list > bo...@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board > -- *Michael Terner* *Executive Vice President* 617-447-2468 Direct | 617-447-2400 Main Applied Geographics, Inc. 24 School Street, Suite 500 Boston, MA 02108 www.AppGeo.com This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient or otherwise authorized to receive this message, you should not use, copy, distribute, disclose or take any action based on the information contained in this e-mail or any attachments. If you have received this message and material in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you on behalf of Applied Geographics, Inc. (AppGeo).
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss