Professor Cannata, > Your answer clarifies that OSGeo has not paid for being listed as sponsor. > > This doesn't change my idea that OSGeo shouldn't be listed as a sponsor an > thus > > I renew my request to the board for removing OSGeo from that list and from > any material listing OSGeo together (at the same level and/or same list of > sponsors). > > That's because the marketing message it brings is clearly undesired and not > respectful of the true.
I'm not a charter member or associated with the FOSS4G organisers, but having attended a FOSS4G event and having been part of a volunteer conference organisation, I respectfully ask that you reconsider. This is a very late change to a lot of conference materials, and at a particularly bad time for the organisers. In software terms, I'm not suggesting that your proposal isn't a valid change, just that it is too late in the release cycle. If nothing else, consider the environmental impact of all that stuff being junked. Brad _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
