I agree. This issue has to be fixed.

Angelos

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Venkatesh Raghavan <
ragha...@media.osaka-cu.ac.jp> wrote:

> On 8/16/2017 8:37 PM, Maria Antonia Brovelli wrote:
>
> I agree completely with Helena. It has to be fixed with the highest priority.
>
> Same here.
>
> Venka
>
> .....
>
> ________________________________
> Da: Discuss <discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org> 
> <discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org> per conto di Helena Mitasova 
> <hmit...@ncsu.edu> <hmit...@ncsu.edu>
> Inviato: mercoledì 16 agosto 2017 13:29
> A: Paulo van Breugel
> Cc: OSGeo Discussions; Helmut Kudrnovsky
> Oggetto: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Project selection on the new website draft
>
> Jody, I have to go so I don't have time to write more but this needs to be 
> fixed instantly to avoid massive backlash against the new website. After so 
> much effort it would be heartbreaking to have a negative reaction just 
> because we would be perceived  as providing advertising platform for projects 
> which are not really free and open source (I guess we will hear more about 
> this from Stallman tomorrow).
>
> Helena
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Paulo van Breugel 
> <p.vanbreu...@gmail.com<mailto:p.vanbreu...@gmail.com> 
> <p.vanbreu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On 8/16/17 9:32 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> We could ask the OSGeo live project what procedure they use, at the moment we 
> have asked on the disc...@osgeo.org<mailto:disc...@osgeo.org> 
> <disc...@osgeo.org> mailing list for open source projects to fill in a google 
> form so we would have content to try out the website with.
>
> There is a very clear distinguishing of OSGeo projects on the website:
>
> a) Sort order is OSGeo projects > OSGeo Community > Other
> b) Only OSGeo projects are available from the menu directly,
> c) When listed OSGeo Projects, and OSGeo Community projects are badged with 
> the appropriate logo
>
>
> When I use the link http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/projects/ directly, I am 
> seeing the page with all projects, with projects in what seems to be random 
> order (and with some of the OSGEO projects, like GRASS, on the last page). 
> Only when I click on 'projects' in the menu am I presented with the projects 
> grouped in Osgeo projects, osgeo community, others. Wouldn't it be preferable 
> to use that page as landing page when using the link 
> http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/projects/ directly?
>
>
> This is going to be an interesting week collecting feedback when lots of the 
> website is not working as designed quite yet (examples tagging and sorting). 
> To be fair the vast majority of project descriptions were entered last 
> weekend so this is our first chance to try things out with actual content :)
>
>
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 16 August 2017 at 02:36, Helmut Kudrnovsky 
> <hel...@web.de<mailto:hel...@web.de> <hel...@web.de>> wrote:
>
>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. August 2017 um 06:28 Uhr
> Von: "Jody Garnett"
> Betreff: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Project selection on the new website draft
>
> Not sure it is much of an explanation - our vision as a group is to empower 
> everyone with geospatial - and there is a lot of open source >spatial to 
> promote.
>
> By the same vision live.osgeo.org<http://live.osgeo.org> 
> <http://live.osgeo.org>[http://live.osgeo.org] includes all kinds of projects 
> :)
>
> The key idea is to help people new to our world to go through the choose a 
> project pages and discover projects that meet their needs.
>
> The website is a beta, we now have enough projects to test out these ideas 
> and see what issues we can find.  There is a meeting tomorrow >with the 
> vendor that should be productive (a hands on training 
> session[https://wiki.osgeo.org
> /wiki/FOSS4G_2017_Code_Sprint#Website_Training] for any one attending foss4g).
>
>
> I'm following the new website and branding process a little bit by the 
> mailing lists.
>
> is there anywhere a documented discussion or a documented and approved 
> decision about how the project selection to be listed on the OSGeo website is 
> done? I can't find anyone.
>
> To be inclusive is one side; not to distinguish OSGeo projects from other 
> software projects from other initatives (e.g. locationtech) or GIS vendors 
> without any supplement words in the OSGeo website, I'm feeling unconformable 
> with it.
>
> Kind regards
> Helmut
>
> OSGeo charter member
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing listdisc...@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org> 
> <Discuss@lists.osgeo.org>https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing listdisc...@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org> 
> <Discuss@lists.osgeo.org>https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
> --
> Helena Mitasova
> Professor
> Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
> North Carolina State University
> 1125 Jordan Hall
> NCSU Box 8208
> Raleigh, NC 
> 27695-8208http://www4.ncsu.edu/~hmitaso/http://geospatial.ncsu.edu/
>
> email: hmit...@ncsu.edu<mailto:hmit...@ncsu.edu> <hmit...@ncsu.edu>
> ph: 919-513-1327 <(919)%20513-1327> (no voicemail)
> fax 919 515-7802 <(919)%20515-7802>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing 
> listDiscuss@lists.osgeo.orghttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>



-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
OSGeo Charter Member
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to