On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Ravi Kumar <manarajahmundry2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Question (would be Board). 'Do you agree that FOSS4G is turning out to > be a hangout for those who can afford it'.. costs (of participation) are > so high that many might not afford.. If selected to the board HOW do you > wish to correct this.. > Hi, I don't know if you are following the current FOSS4G process to select the next venue. It turns out that I am proposing to host FOSS4G 2019 in Sevilla. So I have studied this very close recently. And Jeff is right, it is very difficult to find a cheap place where you can have so many people at the same time. Organizing a conference when you have more than 500 attendees is a huge step forward and requires a lot of investment in organization. Now we are getting closer to the 1500 attendees, can you imagine how difficult is to cut costs if we want to succeed? It was Vasile (who is also competing with Bucarest as venue) who made the spreadsheet comparison about prices and the conclusion is that prices have been very stable among the years if you take inflation into consideration. Ok, we have had an economic depression in some countries and inflation is not the same worldwide. But prices are not getting so much higher as the general public perceives. I hope he can make this numbers public soon, as it was a very interesting spreadsheet about the evolution of FOSS4G. Said this: we can try to make FOSS4G more affordable, and indeed we should. What would I do if I were on the board to get that? Well, if you take a look at the proposal I am chairing in Sevilla[1][2], you will see we are going to lower the prices, get more funds from the general budget for travel grants (and not only wait for people to donate) and also the venue is very cheap to stay at. Having countries that have problems travelling to FOSS4G close is also a good push, but that's not always possible. I think travel grants are a really good thing to improve. But that also means having less surplus from FOSS4G, which is used for other events which are smaller and can be helpful to reach those who can't afford FOSS4G. How do we find balance here? Maybe the idea of everyone going to every FOSS4G is the problem. Having regional FOSS4G and smaller events is a good way to reach those who can't afford to travel (and not only for economic reasons). Of course I would like everyone to be able to travel to FOSS4G regularly, but I think that's not realistic. Taking a full week of holidays for it or making your company pay for your travel (if you have a job!) is not that easy even if you have the money. What about your family and people who depend on you? What about people who have political problems to travel? There is a lot of cases where travelling out of your country or more than a couple of days is a nightmare. I would try to do both approaches: make FOSS4G more affordable with travel grants (who may not pay in all cases the full costs but maybe only part of it to reach more people?) and also reinforce the regional and local events. Lowering the general public cost of a FOSS4G is not as easy as it sounds as many things depends on the (not so big) surplus of FOSS4G. This is a topic to discuss in more detail in the future. [1] https://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/proposals/2019/FOSS4G%202019%20Letter%20of%20Intent%20for%20Sevilla.pdf [2] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G2019_Q%26A_Sevilla Regards, María.
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
