Tina,
Couldn’t agree more with your sentiment, or Vicky’s for that matter too.
Unfortunately men have not been doing such a great job ruling the world. We are
over-aggressive and lack the nurturing instinct, to the native degree women
have it. And classically women have not had the same platform to operate as men.
Affirmative action [1] in the US was put in place to correct that kind of
imbalance. I am not disagreeing with you, just saying we would certainly
benefit by having more women in charge, obviously not the Margaret Thatcher
types (there are exceptions!)
The lunacy of these recent elections has made me rather hungry for another
breed of leadership, and I am quite partial to seeing more opportunity for
those who haven’t had it. Just consider me the kind of guy who likes to see
women on top!
Thank you dearly for your expressed position, I heartily concur, applaud and
root for it!
{1} https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action_in_the_United_States
-[domesticated] Patrick
From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Tina Cormier
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 4:02 PM
To: Cameron Shorter
Cc: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] My feelings about board elections
Hello all,
I am a new Charter Member, so I've just been taking all of this in (and been
somewhat horrified by all that has transpired, if I'm being candid). But I
haven't felt strongly enough to chime in until I saw the note from Frank about
a method for ensuring women and non NA-EU folks are on the board. I want to
echo Vicky's sentiments and say that as a woman, I would never want to be
"elected" in that way. Even the thought of it feels terrible and embarrassing.
I hope the board does not go this route. The end goal of increasing diversity
on the board is a noble one, but hopefully we can find other ways to do it that
are based on the merit of the candidates and not their gender or geography.
Just my two cents on that specific topic.
Cheers,
Tina
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Cameron Shorter
<cameron.shor...@gmail.com<mailto:cameron.shor...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Extending on Maria's comments (and others),
I think we are over-emphasising the relative importance of the OSGeo board.
Reducing the importance of the board will increase the importance and influence
of our OSGeo committees.
If OSGeo is a Do-ocracy and Meritocracy, and the influencers in OSGeo comes
from the Do-ers in our community, then questions like board diversity almost
becomes a non-issue.
Warm regards, Cameron
On 31/10/17 6:14 pm, María Arias de Reyna wrote:
Dear all,
Sorry for the late response. I was busy going back from different timezones and
that is a killer for me (travelling, being sleepy, etc...).
I agree with Sanghee that we have gone one step backwards. We have lost Asia in
the board. That's a step backwards we shouldn't have had. And I agree with 90%
of opinions posted here that are sad about the European-NAmerica board. So I
will just highlight what I don't agree with. And this is an optimistic email, I
don't share the general pessimism. Wait for the end of it.
I don't agree that Venka has been punished somehow despite his good work. Do
you really think that if someone is doing a good work that should warrantee his
position on the board? I don't think so. I think the reward of doing a good job
comes somewhere else: recognition, ¿fame?, trust, acknowledgement, even free
beers! But even if you think a position on the board is a reward, then, maybe
other people have been also rewarded with that for work outside the presidency
of OSGeo but inside the community. Or maybe people just wanted a fresh view,
not necessarily that meaning that his work (or your work!) was bad. There is a
lot of reasons for voting someone and I personally think that a "reward" vote
shouldn't be one. Having other candidates with more votes doesn't mean you did
a bad job at all.
Do I think that you both should be on the board? Yes, of course! But this has
also been (at least for me) a very difficult voting. It was very hard to choose
between the candidates. All had good reasons to be there, all had good work
done inside the community. So, how to choose? I know what you have been doing
because I have done an explicit effort to know about that. I have gone to
international events, I have followed the mailing lists, I have followed many
threads on twitter. Most people only know what people around them do. So it is
possible (and very likely, in my opinion) that a lot of people just see OSGeo
as an organization, but don't see the work of individuals. So for them, Venka
is that person who does the "history of OSGeo" talk, but nothing special around
him that other active members don't have. If we ask members who has been behind
the new website, how many of them would know? And that is something that has
had a lot of publicity recently. What about all the rest of work that has less
exposure?
So when it comes to voting, they see candidates who are active in trying to
show their views and other candidates that are not present. Not being present
on the election process, that is what have drained votes, I would say. Not your
fault, maybe, but how do we explain that to people who don't see individuals
because they are already busy with local and regional stuff?
And now the optimistic part:On the other hand, we have gone two steps forward.
Wait, what? Let me explain:
We are finally half male half female. Although this may not look like a step
forward to some of you, to me it is a huge win. And we did that without the
need for quotas. That't a double win. And it is a tendency that has been stable
so I am optimistic here.
And the other step, but still an important step forward, we have recovered the
long lost Iberoamerican community in the board. Since Jorge Sanz, we haven't
had a spanish-speaking board member. I know I count as European, but I am as
European as I am part of the large (huge!) community that culturally spreads
also on north, central and south America. So yes, Vicky may have been a better
representative of this community because she is not european, but still, I plan
to work hard on getting latin americans closer to OSGeo. Remember that this
community is the ¿largest? community in OSGeo and they are very silent because
many reasons (low English level, no international FOSS4G being done close,
middle income economy that can't afford to travel far or even organizing
codesprints properly!,... etc...). Most of them work hard towards OSGeo and
don't even know there is such a thing as a membership! They just work aligned
with our goals and inside the community, but they see so far away the OSGeo
"official" community that they don't even bother to get closer. To get what?
What would be their motivation to get closer to a community that largely
ignores them?
If you think OSGeo has less importance in South America, check the
GeoInquietos. Different branding, same work. On the FOSS4G-BA, after María
Brovelli's talk about OSGeo, many of them were surprised. They knew about
FOSS4G just because the geoinquietos from Argentina placed it on their
doorstep. But, OSGeo? What's that? Aaah, the same thing they have been doing
but on an English-speaking community.
We have lost Asia, but we have a window to South America. And that's very
important.
And, wait, have we lost Asia? Does it mean that if there is no board member
from Asia, Asia is going to disappear or something?
If you think it will help, we can have something like one representative for
each chapter as advisor or watcher of the board. Why not? Let each chapter
decide who to "send", like embassadors. I think that would be a good approach
to get closer to different communities.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
--
Cameron Shorter
Technology Demystifier, Learnosity
Open Technologies Consultant
M +61 (0) 419 142 254<tel:+61%20419%20142%20254>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
