I thought I'd mention that the GPG signatures in emails sent to this list are currently unverifiable due to the email address of the sender NOT being in the From field. Example:
From: Jorge Sanz via Discuss <discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse migration
Message-ID: <4edbc588-9e29-4c51-9b25-520c0112a...@osgeo.org>
[-- Begin signature information --]
Problem signature from: KeyID 91EB9EC08EC1CAD46631BC5893A8CE9CA5942A46
created: Tue 30 Jan 2024 11:08:19 AM CET
Can't verify due to a missing key or certificate
[-- End signature information --]
I'm adding mailing list owners as I think they should have the last
word on what the configuration of the list should be.
I for one still think we should re-apply the change that I applied
on Jan 11th [1] after nobody had anything to say about my proposal
of Jan 4th [2]
[1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2024-January/040058.html
[2] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2024-January/040048.html
--strk;
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
