Thanks Sandro for caring about this. I understand that some people get annoyed if the prefix is removed (not me personally). That made me compare with google groups: I am in a google groups mailing list, and the emails "pass" for SPF and DKIM. This group has a "prefix" added by the mailing list automatically. What are they doing differently that we cannot?
About the GPG signature, I do not know. Nobody in my google group uses it. Maybe Jorge Sanz has some experience. Cheers, Javier On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 18:33, Sandro Santilli via Discuss < discuss@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > I thought I'd mention that the GPG signatures in emails sent to this > list are currently unverifiable due to the email address of the sender > NOT being in the From field. Example: > > From: Jorge Sanz via Discuss <discuss@lists.osgeo.org> > To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse migration > Message-ID: <4edbc588-9e29-4c51-9b25-520c0112a...@osgeo.org> > > [-- Begin signature information --] > Problem signature from: KeyID 91EB9EC08EC1CAD46631BC5893A8CE9CA5942A46 > created: Tue 30 Jan 2024 11:08:19 AM CET > Can't verify due to a missing key or certificate > [-- End signature information --] > > I'm adding mailing list owners as I think they should have the last > word on what the configuration of the list should be. > > I for one still think we should re-apply the change that I applied > on Jan 11th [1] after nobody had anything to say about my proposal > of Jan 4th [2] > > > [1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2024-January/040058.html > [2] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2024-January/040048.html > > --strk; > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
