seanadams;408409 Wrote: > I'm not sure you actually got what I was saying. But I did. > What do you mean? Very simple: The G network is not the same 'physical' (mind the quotes) as the N network.
> If you're suggesting that a N router is no better than a G router as far > as G clients are concerned, you are wrong! In fact G clients do benefit > from the multipath reception capabilities of an N access point. Oh, sure it does benefit, but compare it to a N network and the gain in usable range isn't that great... > Sorry but you really have this wrong. You are under the misconception > that G devices slow down N devices, in the way that B devices slow down > G devices. It is simply not true. You should test it if you don't > believe me. Do a file transfer between to an N device across your > wireless LAN, then turn off all your G devices and do it again. Ehh... I see no point where I say that a G device slows down a N device and I know that's not the case... I just said it out of pure simplicity: if you have all N devices why would you still enable the G network?... Hmmm, I never thought about my smartphone... -- servies There are 10 kinds of people in the world - those who understand binary and those who don't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ servies's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9496 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=61579 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
