Eric Seaberg;692335 Wrote: > I don't know if this makes any difference to you, but I had problems > with 88.2k files and it ended up being my AV receiver. 96k/192k aren't > a problem at all, but 88.2/176.4 are an odd duck! > > The ONLY reason the original sessions were done at 88.2 or 176.4 is > that the producer knew one of the final products was going to be a CD, > and sample-rate-conversion from 88.1/176.4 to 44.1k is an easy process, > where as 96k/192k isn't. > > In my case converting the 88.2/176.4 files to either 96k or 192k made > all the difference in the world and everything was happy. > > Also, I thought the SB3 couldn't play anything above 48k but did SRC. > The problems I had were on my Transporter and, like I said, ended up > being the D/A on my receiver. > > 88.2k/176.4k is really an odd sample rate and should be avoided... this > isn't a 'sales' issue as much as it is an industry issue. Higher sample > rate playback is, most of the time, going to be associated with video > and MUST be a derivative of 48k to match video sync. Those are the > rules....
176 and 88 may be DSD to the DSD rate is an multiple of 44.1 too ? -- Mnyb -------------------------------------------------------------------- Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) iPad 64gB wifi +3g with iPengHD & SqueezePad (in storage SB3, reciever ,controller ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93680 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
