JohnSwenson wrote: > I plan on having both ports on the Gen0.5 boards so we can test them > both out. I was planning on making both a full size A connector, is > there a need to make the OTG port go into an OTG connector? > Both as full size seems reasonable to me. This will give us flexiblity to test other use cases for usb other than dacs (IR interface etc)
> > It is also possible to put a USB hub chip on the board, which presumably > will help with the UAC1 async DACs. There are some hub chips that say > they have a dedicated TT per downstream port, would this be helpful? If > we decide we want to look at this I want to do it as a separate test > board (see my other post for how easy this is to do). I don't want to > stall the design of the Gen0.5 board while I look into this. > I agree this could be a useful feature for Gen1.0, but let me test the raw output from the wandboard usb host port to validate it needs this for a 1.1 device. [expect to get one next week]. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Triode's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97881 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss