Sounds like they are taking the literal interpretation of a browser. Perhaps consider changing the description an not use "browser" but instead something like "a graphical interface which provides information residing on the internet..."
bluegaspode wrote: > The fix is available for over a week now already. Unfortunately the > App-update is stuck in Apples review process. > > Anyone want to have a laugh, then read on about how the story goes on. > > - Is written above Apple first complained yesterday, that my App did > have an unrestricted browser, thus requires a content rating of 17+ > - I wrote back, that my browser adheres to Apples rules and restricts > browsing > a) on the content level, i.e. only stuff related to the currently > playing artist + album > b) on the system level, i.e. when the user (typically parents) restrict > browsing on the iPad, you cannot circumvent it indirectly with > SqueezePads browser. > and thus should be very fine with having a rating of 4+. > > Today - 24 hours later - Apple decided to complain about my App > description stating the App had a browser. > > In their words: > > > > Isn't this hilarious? > They have no idea of the current feature set, nor do they test it (I > know because they send me screenshots with an error message of having no > server) , but still reject the App right now. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ misternatural's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64943 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=80553 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
