Underclocking seems to make remarkably little difference in my setup - perhaps 3 degrees under load. I don't think my setup is completely representative though, because my Pi lives inside my amplifier, where the ambient temperature is higher than normal. So I set it the task of a clear and rescan on my library - when it's doing that I think the temperature caused by the load on the CPU is less affected by the ambient temperature. But I do suspect the results will be slightly different in other people's setups.
At the default 1500MHz [image: http://www.cjh.me.uk/MyPhotobucket/cache/DIYHifi/Rescan%20at%201500MHz_480.jpg] Underclocked to 1000MHz [image: http://www.cjh.me.uk/MyPhotobucket/cache/DIYHifi/Rescan%20at%201000MHz_480.jpg] Underclocked to 600MHZ [image: http://www.cjh.me.uk/MyPhotobucket/cache/DIYHifi/Rescan%20at%20600MHz_480.jpg] The scan times did take longer: 1500MHz: 6:04 1000MHz: 7:10 600MHz : 9:50 The interface still seems very responsive even at 600MHz. My memory isn't good enough to compare properly with how it was with my 3B+ though. And I haven't tried it with music playback yet. I think I'll leave it at 600MHz for a while to see how well it performs. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ chill's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10839 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=110690 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
