pfarrell Wrote: 
> rudholm wrote:
> > ceejay Wrote: 
> > 
> >>Well, at the top end: a 100Mbps LAN should give you about 50Mbps of
> >>usable throughput, so divide 50,000 by 256 to get 195 theoretical
> >>streams.
> > 
> > 50Mbps?
> > 
> > I'm curious why you don't expect 100Mb/second from your 100Mb/second
> > Ethernet.
> 
> Because Ethernet uses Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision
> Avoidance to control traffic. No Ethernet can deliver its rated
> speed, even getting 50% of its rated speed is hard if not impossible
> if
> there is any sharing of the network.
> 
> And then you have to add overhead, addressing, error correcting,
> ack/nak
> messages, etc.
> 
> For a practical example for Slim users, a WiFi 'b' network is
> rated as 11 megabits/second but it rarely can actually
> delivery uncompressed audio. This is a problem for SB1 users,
> since the SB1 only does WiFi B, and can't do Flac on the fly
> 
> The RedBook specifies that stereo music is to be recorded in 16-bit
> PCM
> sampled at 44.1 kHz. A little arithmetic shows that the data stream of
> CD audio must be at least:
> 
> Data Rate     = "X"
>       = 16 bits * 2 channels * 44.1kHz
>       = 16 * 2 * 44100
>       = 1,411,200 bits/second
>       = 176,400 bytes/second
>       = 172 Kbytes/second
> 
> So while Red Book (or uncompressed audio) is only 1.4 mb/s and that
> is only 12% or so of a WiFi "b" link speed, you can't get it.
> 
> Assuming that you can get 10% of the rated speed is probably good
> engineering.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Pat
> http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html

Whist I agree that you don't get 100%, I think your numbers are
somewhat on the pessamistic side. I get over 80% of theoretical on my
gigabit lan without any tweaking, without jumbo frames, and with the
cheapest lan cards I could buy ($10 each). Not bad. As for your 802.11b
- again the myth that you can't run pcm to an sb1 is just that - a myth.
I was doing it for a long time before I finally replaced my sb1 with a
later model. Sure there was the odd glitch because that buffer was so
small but in general it worked fine. This was with a normal consumer
access point through several walls and with less than 80% signal
strength in a noisy (rf wise) apartment building.


-- 
radish
------------------------------------------------------------------------
radish's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=77
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24454

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to