I think you've got 2 main groups of customers here.  The first, and
probably largest, are geeks who love music.  They already have a
network and a large collection of music files.  They rarely have
trouble setting up the Squeezebox and are willing to tinker with
settings, plugins, nightly builds, and even raw code.  They love the
Squeezebox as a music playback device, but also as a geek toy.

The second group are primarily music lovers and audiophiles.  They see
the Squeezebox as a wonderful way to organize and playback a massive
audio collection.  They are extremely interested in sound quality.  As
a group they have a widely variable skill level as far as computers and
networking; for some setting up EAC and FLAC will be the most difficult
computer task they've ever attempted.  But many audiophiles have a
tinkerer's mentality and can usually get up to speed after absorbing
the new concepts required.

Notice the conspicuous absence of Joe Blow in this picture?  Joe
probably isn't aware of the music server concept.  He knows about iPods
and might even know someone who has one - but he probably doesn't have
one himself.  Forget about this guy.  He probably doesn't have a DVD
player either, preferring to watch old Monster Truck rallies on VHS.  

The greatest potential for expanding the Squeezebox market is from the
iPod crowd.  They have computers and they "get it" that music is just
bits and it's cool to carry around your whole collection.  The problem,
for Slim Devices, is that this group is being served by the many audio
systems that now feature an iPod dock.  That makes it easy to pop your
iPod into your home or portable stereo, and for many people, that will
be all they'll ever need or want.  The iPod is their home music
server.

Slim Devices is a viable solution for people who have in some way
"outgrown" their iPods.  Either they have a lot more music than even
the largest iPod will hold, or they realize that lossy files don't
sound very good on a decent home stereo.  At this point, the customer
begins to resemble one or both of your core customers - the geek or the
audiophile.

The idea of dedicated slimserver hardware is an intriguing one.  A
small, silent PC with enough horsepower to speedily run Slimserver and
some kind of expandable storage would be a good start.  But how
pain-free could you make it?  You're probably talking about a
specialized version of Linux optimized to run Slimserver.  But what
about ripping and tagging?  What about network shares?  How do you
update the server software and plugins?  Solving these problems might
go a long way toward offering a music server platform for "everyman" -
but you'd also be in many ways limiting the flexibility that Slimserver
currently offers.  And you'd be opening whole new realms of customer
support headaches.

I will throw in a few feature requests for a next-generation Squeezebox
(SB4):

Full-width component with full-width display.  I'm not talking about
the 2 displays ala Transporter, but a single display that is double the
width.  This is the killer feature that will sell a lot of SB4s to
current SB owners (though it might tick off current Transporter
owners).

A better DAC.  The DAC in the SB3 is good, and the one in the
Transporter is supposedly excellent.  I'm not saying the Transporter
DAC should go into the SB4 - that might bump the price too high - but
with each hardware generation an effort should be made to find the
best-sounding DAC in the price range.

A linear power supply.  There would be room inside a full-sized
component for a larger and better power supply than the external
switching supply of the SB3.

Basically, I'm asking for SB4 to be "Transporter Lite" - an
evolutionary step forward taking some of the Transporter features and
putting them in a more reasonably-priced component.  Say $500 or $600
tops.  Of course if some of these advances could be incorporated in a
$300 device, that's great, too.  I'd like to see some kind of SD
hardware remain reasonably-priced, even if that means continuing to
sell the current SB3 along with a better, more expensive SB4.


-- 
Pale Blue Ego
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pale Blue Ego's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=110
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=31324

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to