Nick Silkey wrote: > Craig Cook wrote: >> In the 30 or so server range the "free" version of Big Brother will >> work. > > Non-commercial BB also 'works' when you have several hundred servers. I > wouldnt recommend it though. $newjob is very interested in punting said > BB install for Nagios or a derivative (Opsview, etc). Reasons for > include features, scalability, maintenance uplift, etc. > > Given the breadth of whats out there now for monitoring (this thread has > pretty much hit on every viable solution), I cant see justification for > standing up BB at present day ... even with a tiny SOHO/SMB budget.
Well, I haven't seen "Traverse" mentioned. It used to be NetVigil. Anyone using this one? We've got it because 5 years ago there weren't any open source options that would scale to where we needed. Now, I think we could handle 5K hosts and 10K network ports with Nagios+Cacti, maybe? _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
