On 4/8/06, John Panarese wrote: > I have plenty of articles also indicating these facts, but I felt it > wasn't worth the trouble trying to debate this with the message sender in > question. I've been on lists long enough to realize that it would be a > pointless argument that would only perpetuate his enjoyment in list > controversy.
John, your prescience on this point has been nicely proven! Abdul has demonstrated that his ignorance and disassembly is willful, so I will not burden the list with further chatter. I thought it important that his assertions not go unchallenged less some innocent attribute validity to them. My rebuttal stands up despite his further protestations, so I will not be bothered to rebuttal his rebuttal to my rebuttal!
