I thaught it was 80 gb for fat32
----- Original Message ----- From: "Will Thoms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS Xby theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: Parallels WindowEyes and JAWS


You can choose how much of your HD yu assign for the windows partition. so
I guess you can have any size so long as windows XP can fit.  Any sizes
bigger than 30 gig have to be NTFS, meaning OS X won't be able to right to
your windows partition because it can only read and not right to NTFS disks
and the limit for FAT 32 partitions is around 30 GB.


Will
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Howell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by
theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: Parallels WindowEyes and JAWS


Hey curious, when you setup windows using Bootcamp, how much space
was required? I really like the idea of Parallels, but might consider
giving Bootcamp a try to save dragging my laptop home, but that's if
my employer will give me that windows cd cause I ain't buying a copy
just for work purposes.

tnx


Scott



On May 22, 2006, at 3:12 PM, Will Thoms wrote:

> At least on paper running Bootcamp allows you to give windows all
> the Macs
> resources other wise with Parallels you're practically running two
> operating
> systems at the same time.
>
> I'd still be interested to know if there is a reaction time
> difference when
> interacting with both solutions.  My only experience has been with
> bootcamp,
> and that runs access software seriously quickly.  Very snappy.
>
> Will
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "hank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac
> OS Xby
> theblind" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 7:58 PM
> Subject: Re: Parallels WindowEyes and JAWS
>
>
>> is it as quick as boot camp or is it a bit slower? and please keep
>> ip us
>> posted, hopefully we can get jaws working to that would keep us from
>> rebooting if we need to run windows apps.
>> thanks
>> hank
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Will Thoms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac
>> OS Xby
>> theblind" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 11:40 AM
>> Subject: Re: Parallels WindowEyes and JAWS
>>
>>
>>> Wow that's brilliant.  is it possible to use an external sound
>>> card to
>>> pipe
>>> window eyes through when using parallels?
>>>
>>> If so maybe that mite fix the fuzziness.
>>>
>>> good luck and keep us all posted.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Will
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Marshall F. Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "Discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by
>>> theblind"
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 7:32 PM
>>> Subject: Parallels WindowEyes and JAWS
>>>
>>>
>>>> Folks,
>>>> I just tried the latest release of Parallels (RC1) with Windoweyes
>>>> and JAWS.  WindowEyes seems to work with Parallels.  You can
>>>> navigate
>>>> around the screen,  insert text into Notetab and use Firefox.  I'm
>>>> not a Windoweyes user so I did not know what else to try.  I had
>>>> sighted help so I don't know if I could have installed WE without
>>>> sighted help.  The response time seemed OK.  The only problem was
>>>> that the voice sounded fuzzy.
>>>>
>>>> The bad news is that JAWS still has the video intercept problem and
>>>> now causes some kind of problem in Windows.  My helper could not
>>>> read
>>>> the message so I can't be more specific.
>>>>
>>>> We will send comments on to Parallels. but I'm really impressed
>>>> with
>>>> how fast Parallels started working on the problem and the progress
>>>> that has been made.
>>>>
>>>> Marshall
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________ NOD32 1.1552 (20060522) Information __________
>>>
>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>






__________ NOD32 1.1553 (20060522) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com




Reply via email to