cono wrote:
Is there a short reference (which of course means reliable as well) on this?
Perhaps not "short" but certainly reliable and well worth the read. Primary sources: * Peter Galli's eWeek article: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1829728,00.asp * Legal analysis by Marbux (retired lawyer working with Groklaw): http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=20050331183622861#A4 * Brian Jones from Microsoft admits that it's GPL-incompatible. http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2005/09/22/472826.aspx Good secondary sources: (these contain good summaries with references to primary sources) * Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument#Licensing (skip one paragraph) * David Wheeler. http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/why-opendocument-won.html (search for "GPL") Cheers, Daniel. -- DEMAND __ __ __ http://opendocumentfellowship.org/petition/ | ||__)|__|\ | - Tell Microsoft to support it |__|| |__| \|DOCUMENT - Sign the petition --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
