On 11/4/05, Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I was bewildered that someone here would take the statement that OOo > should stick to being an office suite to mean that the OpenDocument > format shouldn't support other features. You grabbed that statement and > made it into something completely different.
Um, no, he didn't. He said that since ODF *can* do xyz, and since ODF is OOo's file format, OOo should (I*H*MO) (H=his) support xyz or at least x, x being something OOo does not already do. *You* on the other hand, took his suggestion, and flew off the handle about it. For me, I think OOo should include a DTP and improved HTML editing. It would also be great if it was able to easily and with the default download (but not necessarily on by default) hook up with and/or into Firefox and Thunderbird. (Shared dictionaries, similar interface, etc.) If HTML editing cannot be improved, then hooks for Nvu should be available. But, I agree with Ian (shock, I know), that the number 1 priority should be more effect design, smaller code, smaller install download, less RAM hog, etc. On the other hand, I am not a coder, I am at best a black sheep in this group, and my opinion doesn't matter. -Chad Smith
