yes, professionals simply have to use microsoft, because oo lack some important features: saving only changes, not the whole document everytime again (10 MB .doc can be save within 1 s, in oo definitely not) faster special symbol handling faster starting
----- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA ----- Od: "Robin Laing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Komu: "OOo Discuss" <discuss@openoffice.org> Předmět: [discuss] Lack of OOo feature forces writer to move to Datum: 4.8.2006 - 18:02:32 > This is an interesting article on how the lack of tracking > and comments > features in OOo have forced a writer to drop their > usage of Linux for > work based writing and moved to Windows. > > The Windows emulation didn't work well enough to use > Word on Linux. > > "Linux expert switches to... Windows?!" > <http://opensource.apress.com/article/76/linux-expert-switches-to-windows> > > > "There’s a good reason, however. Apress makes heavy > use of Word’s > revision tracking function during book production, > as well as its > commenting function. Word places comments in call-out > balloons in the > right margin and automatically connects the balloon > to the text via a > line. In a similar way, deleted text is automatically > placed in a > balloon alongside the text, so I can instantly see > what’s been deleted > and where it came from." > > As both a Linux and OOo promoter, an article like this > is quite interesting. > > I wonder how long until Microsoft gets wind of this > and starts blowing > it out of proportion. > -- > Robin Laing > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Potřebujete připojit server nebo vystavit internetové stránky? http://im.impact.as/sign/zone-hosting/
