To "Rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
special symbols:
look at the two .png files I have attached to this email. microsoft has
a field "recently used", which is so extremely clever, that i am deeply
impressed :)

if there is anybody able to let developers know about it, please do it,
I have not yet explored how to do it

----- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -----
Od: "Rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Komu: [email protected]
Předmět: Re: [discuss] Lack of OOo feature forces writer to move to
Datum: 7.8.2006 - 14:21:07

> Ian Lynch wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 10:11 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
> > >> yes, professionals simply have to use microsoft,
> >> because oo lack some
> >> >> important features:
> >> saving only changes, not the whole document everytime
> >> again (10 MB .doc
> >> >> can be save within 1 s, in oo definitely not)
> >> faster special symbol handling
> >> faster starting
> > 
> > I am a professional in the UK using Writer and Draw
> > for commercial
> > > purpose. I doubt the speed of saving, although nice
> > to have, is critical
> > 
> may i also suggest trying to save the document in odf
> (odt) ?
> first, if you are working on a particular document,
> it really is better
> to do so in native format. second, that would decrease
> file size and
> might improve speed. then, you would have to use .doc
> only when
> exporting (though check that your recipient really
> can not recieve odf ;) ).
> 
> second, if the document is really large, maybe you
> can use master
> document. there is a pretty decent documentation about
> this feature, and
> i have heard that this feature actually works in oo.org,
> unlike in msword ;)
> 
> btw, what's wrong with special symbols ? (unfortunately
> i missed the
> original mail)
> 
> > in the same sense that collobrative tools are. Critical
> > features are
> > > things that really make a significant difference
> > and I can't see having
> > > to wait a few seconds extra on opening and saving
> > documents will fall
> > > into that category unless you have documents of thousands
> > of pages and I
> > > would be a little worried about the reliability of
> > MS Word with
> > > documents that long (probably better to break them
> > up into smaller more
> > > manageable files in any case). I'm currently working
> > on an 82 page
> > > document in Writer for a professional purpose and
> > I just saved my latest
> > > update in under 3 seconds - hardly time to pause
> > to think. The fact that
> > > I can directly export it to PDF more than outweighs
> > any inconvenience
> > > there. The fact that the format is open is another
> > thing to trade off
> > > against speed and to me any professional tying up
> > their work in a
> > > proprietary undocumented format is taking an unnecessary
> > risk. Since
> > > Writer has been running for several days now with
> > this document open, I
> > > haven't noticed any problems with load speeds. If
> > I do shut the entire
> > > machine down, getting to the Ubuntu Linux desktop
> > and Opening Writer and
> > > the document is significantly faster than starting
> > up Windows on the
> > > other machine on my desk that has a faster processor.
> > I should think the
> > > variations in log in speeds to networks make the
> > speed of opening writer
> > > documents relatively insignificant when you look
> > at the whole thing in
> > > context and when you have the software up and running
> > it really doesn't
> > > matter.
> > 
> > So yes improve speed and improve collaborative tools
> > but if it comes as
> > > a trade off between current speed and open standards
> > I'll stick with
> > > open standards, thanks.
> > 
> > Ian
> -- 
> Rich
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
Lifestylový magazín pro ženy – vše o módě, kosmetice, trendech a účesech.
http://im.impact.as/sign/mp-chocolate/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to