Michele wrote: > I am afraid I will have to disagree. I can provide links to MSO documents > made very professionally using styles throughout that still don't convert > nicely in OOo. Indentations for example are not correct, outline numbering > disappears (and with it the ToC) and so on.
* Presentation markup styles; * Content markup styles; Both MSO and OOo tend to confuse both of those types of styles. Unfortunately, they don't confuse the same thing for each type of style. These are trivial annoyances that can be fixed in a heartbeat by those who understand styles, _and_ consistently use them. When styles are not consistently used, then the results are unpredictable. This is as true for MSO -> OOo conversion as it is for MSO -> MSO conversion. xan jonathon -- OOo can not correct for incompetence in creating documents from MSO. Furthermore,OOo can not compensate for the defective and flawed security measures used by Microsoft. As such, before using this product for exams that require faulty and defective software, ensure that you will not be unjustly penalized for the incompetence of the organization that requires the use of software that is known to be flawed, defective, bug-ridden, and fails to meet ISO file format standards. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
