Are you planning to solve this problem in near future or do you have any suggestions to mitigate this problem?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:33:56PM -0700, Joji Mtt wrote: > > I am trying to figure out if there would be a packet order issue with the > > current version of OVS. Consider a case where a controller has added a > > forwarding rule for a specific flow (Flow A) and this rule is not yet > > installed in the DP. In this scenario, it is conceivable that certain > > (bursty) traffic patterns on Flow A can result in the packets being sent > > out of order. E.g. consider an initial burst of 5 packets that miss the > > kernel flow table, followed by several subsequent packets arriving at > > random intervals. As soon as the userspace processes the flow miss, it > will > > install a rule in the kernel. Depending on the relative timing of the > rule > > installation, any of these subsequent packets could get switched directly > > by the kernel before the previous packets that took the slow path could > get > > forwarded. I couldn't find any special handling to cover this case. Most > > likely it is already handled and I am just missing the part where it is > > done. Could anyone clarify this for me? > > Yes, it's possible to get out-of-order packets for this reason. > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > discuss@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
