Hi discuss@,

As posted on [email protected] [1], we'd like to begin migrating
Buildstream over to the ASF.  As mentors, Sander and I feel that the rough
priority list should be as follows:

1) Migration of the relevant mailing lists
2) Migration of the source code to ASF (including CLAs/software grants as
necessary)
3) Conducting a Buildstream release under the ASF auspices and rules
4) Migrate the website and other public documentation to ASF

Once these items are completed, I believe that Buildstream would be able to
stand on its own as a independent PMC.  Until then, we'd keep in
coordination with the Petri PMC.

GUADEC 2020 is coming up in late July, so we'd like to demonstrate progress
by then; I don't believe that we have to have everything completed by then,
but it's a good milestone to work towards.

For the lists, we'd like to avoid having to rename the lists and
infrastructure at a later date.  How does the Petri PMC feel about this?  I
know that the Incubator prefers an intermediate step of going to <podling>-
[email protected] ; but, for existing OSS communities trying to come
in, that'd be 2 additional changes.  So, how do we feel about going
straight to the eventual TLP domain?  We can definitely have suitable
disclaimers on the releases and websites until there is an independent PMC
stood up.

Sander and I have kicked around builds.apache.org as the eventual domain
for Buildstream as we eventually seeing it become an umbrella PMC with
other build-related projects - as such Buildstream as the TLP name might
not be ideal.  That said, there already exists a builds.apache.org for the
ASF CI tooling...so, I think that we're open to other suggestions here -
we'll also solicit feedback from the existing Buildstream community in
parallel.

Once we agree upon the domain name, we'd want to request creation of a dev@
and private@ list and then we can start on migrating traffic and begin
coordination steps 2-4 above on those mailing lists.

Cheers.  -- justin

1. https://mail.gnome.org/archives/buildstream-list/2020-April/msg00010.html

Reply via email to