https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache#Housing:
All people in the Apache tribe lived in one of three types of
houses. The first of which is the teepee, for those who lived in
the plains. Another type of housing is the [[Wigwam|wickiup]], an
8-foot-tall (2.4 m) frame of wood held together with yucca fibers
and covered in brush usually in the Apache groups in the highlands.
[...] The final housing is the hogan, an earthen structure in the
desert area that was good for cool keeping in the hot weather of
northern Mexico.
HTH. There are a number of nouns in there…
Sander Striker wrote on Sat, 02 May 2020 21:01 +0200:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Funnily enough I have that page in my recent browser history. "
> builds.apache.org" is indeed not the most practical in that sense. I guess
> we run into one of the top problems in engineering again, naming things. I
> need to be a in a more creative mood for that, as currently only
> "construction site" and "redibute" spring to mind. The latter being short
> for REpeatable DIstributable BUild and TEst... If anyone has a lightbulb
> moment...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sander
>
>
> On Sat, May 2, 2020, 17:57 Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > -1 on builds.apache.org. This sub domain is used for Infrastructure
> > Jenkins by almost every Apache project. I’m surprised you haven’t noticed.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On May 2, 2020, at 5:02 AM, Sander Striker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 7:34 PM Daniel Shahaf <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Justin Erenkrantz wrote on Sat, 25 Apr 2020 15:39 +00:00:
> > >>> For the lists, we'd like to avoid having to rename the lists and
> > >>> infrastructure at a later date. How does the Petri PMC feel about
> > >> this? I
> > >>> know that the Incubator prefers an intermediate step of going to
> > >> <podling>-
> > >>> [email protected] ;
> > >>
> > >> The Incubator switched to dev@<podling>.incubator.apache.org and then
> > to
> > >> dev@<podling>.apache.org (e.g., https://nuttx.apache.org/community/).
> > >>
> > >>> but, for existing OSS communities trying to come
> > >>> in, that'd be 2 additional changes. So, how do we feel about going
> > >>> straight to the eventual TLP domain? We can definitely have suitable
> > >>> disclaimers on the releases and websites until there is an independent
> > >> PMC
> > >>> stood up.
> > >>
> > >> Sounds good to me, though we might want to give trademarks@ a heads up.
> > >>
> > >
> > > FYI, I gave trademarks@ a heads-up.
> > >
> > >
> > >> Cheers,
> > >>
> > >> Daniel
> > >>
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Sander
> >
> >
