On 03-Jan-2006, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > I wish there were some clear solution to this issue.... > > There is, simply not supporting companies that refuse to give > specifications to their hardware, and nagging them to release these > specs.
Which is not a solution unless everyone else does the same.
> The OpenBSD community has been very sucessfull in this regard, and
> it is a bit of a shame that the GNU project, the FSF and FSFE have
> been a bit lacking.
How can "the GNU project, the FSF and FSFE" do more in the "not
supporting [proprietary 3D hardware companies]" regard? AFAIK, none of
them "support" those companies already. Is there something else
"lacking"? If so, you haven't stated it.
As for Linux, that's certainly a sore spot. Many kernel developers are
happy dealing with the devil. Fortunately, there are also many like
Greg Kroah-Hartman:
<URL:http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/stable_api_nonsense.html>
<URL:http://zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/2005-October/011317.html>
<URL:http://www.kroah.com/log/2005/11/21/>
--
\ "I was in a bar the other night, hopping from barstool to |
`\ barstool, trying to get lucky, but there wasn't any gum under |
_o__) any of them." -- Emo Philips |
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
