MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is especially ironic > given the increasing use of proprietary webapps by FSF projects.
I don't know which proprietary webapps you're refering to. Do you mean "proprietary" as in FSF violating it's own interpretation of free software or violating your definition (you might call AGPL non-free) of it? Or do you mean that not FSF but the off gnu.org homepages of some GNU packages are using proprietary webapps (like maybe sourceforge?) ? -- Ciarán O'Riordan, +32 477 36 44 19, http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ Support free software, join FSFE's Fellowship: http://fsfe.org Recent blog entries: http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/links_gnu_osm_gnewsense_bangalore http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/japanese_pdfs_part_2_xetex http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/links_translation_bsod_orwell_releases http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/fsfe_meeting_tonight_in_brussels_thurs_7th _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
