MJ Ray wrote: > However, FSF have fallen into a trap of licence-gazing and have > published the terrible AfferoGPLv3. AGPLv3 is hazardous to charities > and cooperatives - even if the lawyerbombs resolve in the best > possible ways, it pushes up costs of these marginal providers because > of the sins of Big-Webmail-like providers.
Hazardous? I'd love to know how. > This is especially ironic given the increasing use of proprietary webapps by > FSF projects. I > fear FSFE would not dare to criticise FSF's Affero-advocacy, so could > not be relied upon to identify non-trap providers reliably. Which of the following FSF projects? * GNU Project * Defective by Design * Bad Vista * End Software Patents * OpenDocument Campaign * ACTA * High priority projects * Free Software Directory I'm aware, as you are, of one single piece of GNU software (Mailman) using a non-free bug tracker/wiki on their own site, plus I'm sure bazaar uses Launchpad.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
