I used to that as well at one time. There was no feedback if it was worthwhile so I stopped when I became too busy. There were no comments about not having it in the forum.
I used to send one email for all the upstream updates - i.e. the ones that you get anyway from upstream. Then for each package that a dev produces I would send one. I'll look at getting the scripts out soon. Ian -----Original Message----- From: discussion-boun...@lists.contribs.org [mailto:discussion-boun...@lists.contribs.org] On Behalf Of Terry Fage Sent: Friday, December 5, 2014 5:19 PM To: discussion@lists.contribs.org Subject: Re: [discussion] NFR and Bug updates that are released singly On 6/12/2014 8:20 AM, Hsing-Foo Wang wrote: > historically, Ian would announce each and every updated > e-smith-*/smeserver-* RPM on the ML. OK then I need to keep that same SOP. I can also see the value in posting something to the forums, far more watch it than the MLs _______________________________________________ Discussion about project organisation and overall direction To unsubscribe, e-mail discussion-unsubscr...@lists.contribs.org Searchable archive at http://lists.contribs.org/mailman/public/discussion/ _______________________________________________ Discussion about project organisation and overall direction To unsubscribe, e-mail discussion-unsubscr...@lists.contribs.org Searchable archive at http://lists.contribs.org/mailman/public/discussion/
