On 06/26/2015 03:53 AM, Werner Almesberger wrote: > The result may be a bit "blocky" for the current form factor (case > about 1:2, display 1:2 as well) but the 1:1.7 ratio could work quite > well with the AAA design (case currently about 1:1.2).
I'll admit I was thinking more in terms of "logo" than "logo on device". The device *is* an obvious place where we'd want the logo though, so it indeed should be made to work well there. > What I'm not sure about is whether, by putting the lock in the center > and by the line break making the rest of the name a little harder to > put together, this doesn't put too much emphasis on the lock. I.e., > that the message changes from "it's about locking" to "this is a > (pad)lock". That's a good point. While the locking is very important, Anelok isn't really a lock in that sense, it just uses one. Locks generally protect something external to the lock itself, while Anelok protects something inside itself, so it's more akin to a box with integrated lock. And yes, the name being harder to read this way is one of my concerns about the design too. It wouldn't be difficult to see it as "AELK" around a lock, or "ALK" with some bars in the remaining corner, which seems more like an acronym than a name. > But very interesting development. Thanks ! You're welcome. :) Feel free to use it or not as you wish. -EdorFaus _______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
